The poisonous tongue of Jonathan Rose. The trickery of the CPS

By Norman Scarth

The poisonous tongue of ‘Judge’ Jonathan Rose, the illegal trickery of the Crown Prosecution Service & the twisted minds of each – not uncommon in the profrssion.

A lie is the intention to deceive, whatever the words. A Jewish proverb says, “A half-truth is a whole lie”. William Blake said, “A truth told with false intent beats all the lies man can invent.”

The great skill of lawyers is the ability to twist the truth. It is that which causes this parasitic profession to be despised all over the world, as indeed they are! The greater that skill, the less they are troubled by conscience when using it, the wealthier they become. In Britain, the worst of them become judges.

Before going on to ‘Judge’ Jonathan Rose QC, a bit about the Crown Prosecution Service:

By the last postal delivery minutes before I fled the land of my birth(¹) came an envelope from the CPS containing 3 letters from them, all dated 21^st February 2012, along with various ‘Witness Statements’ etc. (My ‘trial’ was to be on the very next day!) One letter said inter alia, “The prosecutor wants to introduce this evidence in writing instead of the witness(es) giving the evidence in person”. (In the words of Mandy Rice-Davies, “He would say that wouldn’t he” – being desperate to avoid his ‘witnesses’ being torn apart in the Witness Box.)

He goes on to say, “How to reply to this notice: If you do NOT want the prosecutor to introduce the evidence of these witnesses in writing, you must(²)

1. List the witness(es) you want to give evidence in person.
2. Send me the list not more than 7 days after this notice is served on you (as required by section blah, blah, blah!)
3. Be prepared to explain to the court what issue(s) in the case make(s) it necessary for the witness(es) to give evidence in person (as required by Criminal Procedure Rules blah, blah, blah.)
   NOTE:The CPS had COMPLETELY & CONTEMPTUOUSLY IGNORED my email to them on 6^th February saying that I wanted ALL the witnesses to appear in person – for obvious reasons – PLUS the senior police officer who authorised and organised the operation, PLUS the main complainant, Jonathan Rose. They had also ignored my request that they should tell me the cost of this massive Police/CPS operation so far (for the terrible ‘crime’ of offering leaflets) & whether they had considered AS THEY ARE REQUIRED TO DO, whether it was ‘In The Public Interest’ to prosecute.
   NOW TO JONATHAN ROSE:

Another of the 3 letters (from Gerry Wareham, Deputy Chief Prosecutor, South Yorkshire & Humberside CPS) says, “Please find enclosed copy of Jonathan Rose’s Victim Personal Statement. This does not form part of our evidence but we intend to use it at court.” SO THAT HE CANNOT BE CHALLENGED ON HIS DIATRIBE OF POISON (more than 3,000 words)!!! SURELY, NOT EVEN QUISLING LAW ALLOWS THIS??

(I started to insert my comments IN CAPITALS, IN RED for easy recognition but gave up after a few, as his diatribe became more ridiculous. What a brave man he is when causing ‘alarm, distress & fear’ to the unfortunates before him (& their families). What a whining, whimpering coward he is when someone dares to tell the truth about him outside!)

The ‘VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT’ says:

“Incident Thursday 29^th September 2011 (Note: The lack of a space after the paragraph numbers is from Rose, though I have used a readable size font,(rather than the barely readable size which he used).

1I have provided a statement to the police concerning the events of Thursday 29^th September 2011. This statement is intended to set out the impact of those events, on myself and my family and on the congregants of the United Hebrew Congregation (UHC).

2The 29^th & 30^th September 2011 were the days of ‘Rosh Hashana.’ The Jewish New Year which, along with Yom Kippur (The Day of Atonement, due to take place on Saturday 8^th October) are the holiest days in the Jewish Calendar. Unlike the civil New Year, Rosh Hashana is a religious event which is of importance as it begins a period known as The Ten Days of Penitence which lasts until Yom Kippur Day. It is a time for prayer and repentance & is not a ‘festival’ in the sense of being a period of parties & ‘fun’. What may not be generally known to those who are not of the Jewish faith is that the ‘Jewish day’ begins at sundown the previous evening. The relevance of that to this matter is that the evening of 29^th September was itself highly significant marking as it did the beginning of the second day of Rosh Hashana, so that, although prayers are recited in the synagogue on every evening, the services on this particular evening were more substantial & significant, held in in the main sanctuary of the synagogue and attended by a greater number of people than might be the case on an ‘ordinary’ evening. Moreover, on Thursday 29^th September a special youth service was being held at the UHC and was attended by a great many young people between 12 and 14. (AM I SUPPOSED TO KNOW ALL THIS?)

3It is very easy for any person to establish when Rosh Hashana falls: a common diary will give the date of this event. It is less easy for someone to understand that the evening service at Rosh Hashana is of any significance, or that the congregation would be larger or that a Jew who is more observant would be likely to attend, still less at what time the service would be taking place. Given that Norman Scarth travelled to UHC synagogue on Shadwell Lane, Leeds intending to be present outside the synagogue while evening prayers were being said, & given that his intended target was myself (because his shouts of ‘Jonathan Rose resign’ were obviously directed at me) it is an inevitable conclusion that this was a pre-meditated action, with careful preparation in establishing (i) that I was an orthodox & observant Jew (ii) that I was a member of the UHC (there are two other orthodox synagogues in Leeds (iii) that 29^th September was a particularly significant night in the Jewish calendar (iv) the time of the service on that night (v) that I would likely be attending services on this particular night (as I would not ordinarily attend services on a Thursday evening). It is also clear from the footage posted on Youtube, which shows Mr Scarth walking towards the pedestrian gate into the synagogue grounds, that it was his intention to enter the grounds, if not the synagogue itself, not merely to remain in the street for the purpose of his ‘demonstration’. He therefore was clearly intent on a confrontation with me, possibly, probably within my place of worship. It is important to take note of this, because it is obvious that this was never intended by him to be a ‘peaceful demonstration’ but rather a confrontation which would inevitably be deeply distressing to myself and to other people present in the synagogue who would have witnessed it. The aggression and unpleasantness in what Mr Scarth went on to shout indicates that such a confrontation would have involved at least, significant and aggressive abuse, if not worse. That he was unable to enter the synagogue building or grounds was due only to the intervention of CST.

4I doubt that Mr Scarth would have known that there was to be a youth service that evening, but he would doubtless have had an expectation that the congregation would be particularly large and he would not have had any reason to believe that that congregation would not have included omen & children. It so happened that present in the synagogue that evening was a young woman who was in the later stages of pregnancy and when I left the sanctuary and entered the foyer, as Mr Scarth’s shouting continued, this woman was also in the foyer, somewhat distressed and being comforted by her husband.

5For many years synagogues have been exposed to and sometimes the victims of attacks, by a variety of people with a variety of reasons – whether anti-Semitic or anti-Israel or otherwise. The members are particularly vulnerable and this vulnerability is felt in particular at night (for obvious reasons) and on the High Holy Days of Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur. It is for this reason that the organisation known as CST (Community Support Trust) and its predecessors were established. Its members, all of whom are volunteers, provide security for the community (1) by providing a visible deterrent (ii) by acting as an ‘early warning’ system and (iii) by taking action if it becomes necessary, calling the police or, in the last resort, physically intervening to protect the buildings and members of the community. Their presence brings a measure of comfort and confidence to those inside a synagogue. It should be noted that an observant Jew would not have in his possession any mobile phone on Rosh Hashana, since it is prohibited to use one. This means such a person has no means of communication or calling for assistance, but the members of CST do carry means of communication, whether by mobile phone or radio. One feature of the events of 29^th September was that, when the incident took place I had no mobile phone with me and could not contact my wife to warn her of the incident and its potential consequences. Although my wife and children were not in the synagogue, at the time then incident was taking place I did not know whether Mr Scarth had been able to locate my home address (he had clearly been able to establish which synagogue I would be attending) and I was fearful that some similar event or worse might be taking place at my home, with my wife and I unable to make contact. Moreover, because observant Jews are prohibited from travelling in a car on Rosh Hashana I was unable to get home to my family quickly after the incident had ended. It was but one upsetting feature of the incident that, fearful for my family’s welfare and safety I felt obliged to borrow and use a mobile phone to make contact with my wife, in order to inform and advise her, thus breaking the religious prohibition on using a phone. The phone was borrowed from a less-observant member of the congregation.

6I first became aware of the presence of Norman Scarth, that evening, in the latter part of the service, when I was reciting the ‘Amidah’ (sometimes known as the ‘Standing Prayer’ because it is recited silently and individually whilst standing perfectly still) one of the most significant parts of the service. I heard a voice using a megaphone. It took me a moment to realise that the voice was shouting my name, “Jonathan Rose resign” and I recognised at that time the voice of Norman Scarth.

7I had been aware, at and after the time that I sentenced Scarth that he was a man with a relatively-recent conviction for serious violence, that he was an angry and aggressive person, notwithstanding his age and that a number of people who support him had great animosity towards me and that some had expressed a view that I should suffer for my actions in imprisoning Mr Scarth, albeit that I had not received any threat, direct or indirect, from any communications made to me. I was also aware that some of those who were supporters of Mr Scarth were from a range of backgrounds, including some ‘political’ (specifically right-wing) organisations, and I had in mind such organisations, some of whom are noted to have anti-Semitic tendencies, and not knowing who was with Mr Scarth on this occasion I was naturally concerned that there might be people of such persuasions and tendencies. It followed that, as soon as I became aware that Scarth was responsible for the shouting I could hear, I was immediately fearful for my own safety, for that of other people attending the synagogue services (including the children) and, in particular, for my wife and family, since I had at least the security of being inside the synagogue and with CST outside, whilst my wife was at home with my children. It was that latter fear which necessitated me breaking my religious beliefs in order that they could be protected.

8It was undoubtedly the case that some of those attending the service were very distressed by what was happening. Mr Scarth’s voice being clearly audible and the nature of what he was shouting being of a kind particularly distressing to Jews, containing as it did references to the gas chambers, Nazis, the Gestapo and suchlike. I have already mentioned the pregnant woman, and the children too – many of whom were not accompanied by their parents – were doubtless also fearful and upset. The police, quite properly and understandably required everyone to remain inside the synagogue until the disturbance had been dealt with, and this necessary but enforced detention contributed to the fear and distress caused by the actions of Mr Scarth, and those who were with him.

(ROSE SPENDS HIS WHOLE WORKING LIFE INFLICTING ‘ENFORCED DETENTION’ ON PEOPLE. PERHAPS HE WILL NOW BETTER UNDERSTAND THE ‘FEAR & DISTRESS’ FELT BY THEM – & THEIR FAMILIES!)

9The police offered me a lift home, which would have ensured my safety and brought me back to my family expeditiously. However, as I have said, as an observant Jew, I am prohibited from travelling in a car on Rosh Hashana and therefore declined the offer. I walked home, which took some time, and was throughout this journey fearful that Mr Scarth and/or his supporter might follow me to do me harm, to identify where I lived and, potentially to do harm to my family. It being dark by this time my fears were naturally heightened, I had no idea where Mr Scarth or his supporters were or what transport they might be using. It was therefore a nervous walk home with real anxiety whenever a car approached.

10On arriving home I found my wife and children also in a state of some anxiety – for me (both because of what they then knew had happened at the synagogue and because they knew I would be walking home) and for themselves. My wife had called her brother to come to the house to support them whilst waiting for my return. She was extremely distressed by what had taken place and remains so at the time of writing this statement.

11I should return to the events at the synagogue. At the time, I heard distinctly two things shouted by Mr Scarth. Firstly that I should resign. Secondly – and this is not a direct quote – I heard Mr Scarth shout words to the effect that his service in the Second World War ‘helped to save the Jews from the gas chambers’. I was later shown by the police a poster or flyer drawn up by Mr Scarth and his supporters. I understand that they had posted some of these in the vicinity of the synagogue although they were removed. The posters again called for my resignation as a judge and as President of the UHC (an office I had held for 5 years until May 2011 when my term came to an end). The link made by Mr Scarth to my presidency of the synagogue added to his comments about Jews altered, to me, the approach being taken, in that it appeared to graft onto his animosity based on my having imprisoned him an element of anti-Semitism. The posters to which I have referred included words to the effect that his war service had ‘saved (my) grandparents and parents from the gas chambers’.

12Every Jew, in every country has within him or her the most profound gratitude to those who fought the Nazis in the War, and fully appreciates the millions of lives lost in doing so. We owe a deep debt of gratitude to those men and women and, living in the United Kingdom we acknowledge how the courage and bravery of servicemen from this country kept the Germans from invading, where failure would have meant that the Jews of the United Kingdom would likely have met the same fate of the millions who perished in the Nazi concentration camps.(YET HE SHOWS HIS ‘GRATITUDE’ BY SENDING ONE OF THOSE MEN TO A HELL-HOLE PRISON!) But for Mr Scarth to use the appalling events of 1939 – 1945 – and particularly the Holocaust – in the content of his animosity towards me is hurtful and unforgiveable. A significant number of my relatives in what was then Karlsbad, Czechoslovakia were deported to and died in Auschwitz.

13It is perhaps trite to comment that the evening of 29^th September had an adverse effect on the enjoyment of Rosh Hashana by me and my family, but the impact was more significant than that. When I walked to and from the synagogue on Friday 30^th, particularly for the evening service and again on the Sabbath (1^st October) I was anxious and concerned in case I was followed or observed or, worse, there was any confrontation with Mr Scarth, and my wife shared my concerns. Nor has the impact of Mr Scarth’s actions diminished in any way thereafter. I am concerned for the safety of myself and my family and, although the police have been extremely helpful and supportive I worry for my family when we are at home (and even more so if I am not at home and my family is alone), when we go about our daily routines and when my wife and children are out at night.

14The incident on 29^th September was filmed by a person attending in support of Mr Scarth and the video was posted on Youtube. In the following days, a number of people posted anonymous comments to this video which were of themselves grossly offensive, insulting and upsetting. I accept that people may choose to criticise the sentence I imposed on Mr Scarth, but comments such as “most judges are kiddie fiddlers anyway and Judge Rose is corrupt to the core”, “the scum judge, (is) probably a paedophile anyway” and 2”JUDGE ROSE IS PROBABLY A PAEDOPHILE” are deeply and gratuitously offensive and have caused great upset to myself and my family. Whilst I do not suggest that Norman Scarth posted the video or any of the comments, they are a direct consequence of his actions and added greatly to the suffering of myself and my family.

15It should not be forgotten that Mr Scarth came to disrupt and did disrupt people who were following their faith and at prayer. He did not begin his demonstration before or after the service, but rather he shouted his offensive comments whilst I and the congregation were reciting prayers which we regard as holy, and at a most significant time in the Jewish calendar. Mr Scarth did not interfere only with my right to observe my faith, but with the rights of others attending the synagogue and with who it cannot be said he had any argument.

16My wife and I have been deeply distressed and upset that Norman Scarth should act in such an offensive way on a day we regard as holy. He must have known that the date was of the greatest significance to Jews and I feel he deliberately targeted me on that day to maximise the distress he would cause. He planned and sought out a situation in the hope it would result in a confrontation with me and, failing that, acted in a way which caused distress, anxiety and fear to many people at the synagogue and to my family and I. It is difficult to understand what he could possibly have hoped to achieve by targeting me in this way, other than to cause me and my family distress and upset.

Signed JLRose 12.1.12

ENDNOTE BY N.SCARTH: AS SAID, I COULD HAVE INSERTED MANY MORE COMMENTS, BUT I HOPE THE READER WILL SEE HOW RIDICULOUS AND POISONOUS HIS STATEMENT IS, WITHOUT FURTHER HELP FROM ME.N.Scarth 2^nd March 2012 (now, hopefully, safe from the Quislings who now rule ‘Perfidious Albion’.)

PS: It was Martin Narey, one-time Director-General of the Prison Service (NO LESS) who told of ‘A litany of failure & moral neglect in Hell-Hole Prisons. It was General Sir David Ramsbotham, HM Chief Inspector of Prisons (now Lord Ramsbotham) who told of ‘Barbaric Prison Guards’.

1^ The country for which I had fought in World War II, in which I had worked honestly & hard for 70 years – harder than ever now, as I seek to expose the rotten apples in the judiciary!

2^ Note the arrogance of these lawyers – “you MUST!” They think they are God Almighty!

Norman Scarth forced to seek asylum in Hitler’s Homeland!!!!!!!!!

World War II veteran Norman Scarth served on the Arctic Russian Convoys & in the Scharnhorst battle. Few of those men are left now, & the nation PURPORTS to regard them as ‘Heroes’ (though he never makes that claim). He was proud to be British until the age of 70, when he started to learn that Britain was not the land for which he thought he was fighting all those years ago. In particular, he leaned that corruption is rampant in the British courts. In memory of all those who had died around him in WW2, he could not turn his back & made it his mission in life to expose the corruption. It has proved to be a very dangerous mission: The Judicial Mafia do not LIKE being exposed, & have given their police boot boys carte blanche to do whatevr they can to silence him. In collusion, they have used treachery beyond belief. Norman Scarth has been forced to flee the country & is hoping to gain asylum in Hitler’s Homeland, Austria! he has had enough after more than 15 years of persecution which became serious after 1997 when he stood for Parliament & published the book, ‘Cause for Concern’. It became life-threatening after his single-handed success in the European court of Human Rights brought a vital change in British law, a change much hated by lawyers & judges. He would now like to live what few months or years are left to him without the constant fear of the last 15 years in Quisling ruled Britain. On 23rd February he was due to appear in Manchester City Magistrates’ Court on another malicious charge, but by that time had fled the country, saying they will have to proceed in his absence. He has lodged a Statutory Declaration with the court, statingdavid, inter alia, that Quisling Laws & Quisling Courts have no authority in Britain, & says to whoever is presiding, “Do your worst – & nobody knows better than me how evil that worst can be! ‘Perfidious Albion’ was never more so than now!”

STOP PRESS: It is understood the judge who presided refused to proceed with the case in his absence, & has ordered the arrest of this 86 year old Arctic Convoy Hero, & that if caught he must not be given bail. We presume he has alerted Interpol? And the ‘crime’ committed by this World war II veteran? Offering leaflets!!! Will the British People ever wake up to the savagery of the State they live in? It is beginning to look most unlikely.

http://www.WeAreChangeManchester.com

http://www.WeAreChangeLeeds.com

http://www.facebook.com/wearechangeuk

http://www.youtube.com/NormanScarth (Norman Scarth’s Youtube Channel)

http://www.youtube.com/v964269 (Keith Dewsnup’s Youtube Channel)

Please support Norman Scarth at Court

Thursday, January 12, 2012, 1:30 PM

Leeds Magistrates’ Court,

Westgate, Leeds LS1 3JP, Leeds (map)

This is a committal proceedings hearing.

Norman Scarth Appeal at the Appeals Court London this Friday

Norman Scarth will be at the Appeal Court on Friday, Case 2011/04646 B1 in the Royal Courts of Justice on the Strand in London this 9th December 2011.

Please spread the word to support him once again as this time he goes for the Appeal of his Conviction.

Norman Scarth was never able to Appeal his Conviction at the earlier hearing on the 9 September 2011, this due to apparently being forced contracted when the result was that he was released as the Appeal was only addressing the fact that he was in Prison unfairly and therefore it was only the Prison Sentence that was ever Quashed.

This is another chance to address the issue of recording in Court, especially given that at the earlier hearings it was only ever proven that Norman had a recording device, but was never proven that it was being used, and being that if it was, there was, and still is a case for ‘necessity’ due to the perceived corruption going on within the Court room which ultimately could have ended in a loss of life for such an elderly gentleman of 86, as Norman Scarth is, if a Judge, as he did chose to send him to Prison to acheive the end result of silencing him.

Generally, if ‘necessity’ can be proven in a case it is due to the fact that there is a life or death situation and that by taking the action that is deemed as being ‘necessary’ to prevent loss of life, an action that may be considered a breach of Law is then considered as not being a breach of Law in that situation “as, ‘necessity’ knows no Law“.

To the United Kingdom Defence Association (& British Forces News):

Over the last few days there has been much spoken & written of ‘the debt the nation owes’ to those who served on the Arctic Russian Convoys of World War II  (see attachment for last moments of Scharnhorst battle).  Apparently there are only 200 of them left.  Back in August the Russians gave a great welcome to some of those men who went to Russia to commemorate the 70th Anniversary of the first of the convoys.  While they being feted, they did not give a damn about one of their ‘Shipmates’ who, at the age of 85, had been sentenced to six months in the ‘Hell-Hole’ known as Armley Gaol(six months at 85 is equal to 15-20 years for a younger man).    SUPPOSEDLY for ‘Contempt of Court’, it was really to silence him & prevent him writingANOTHER book exposing the all too many rotten apples in the judiciary.    There came not a word of protest from the ‘watchdogs’ of the so-called ‘News Media’, nor indeed from those millions who would soon be buying poppies ”to show their gratitude’(???) to men like him!   It was left to other people from around the world, USA, Canada, Australia, Germany – even Prime Time Russian TV – to express outrage at this diabolical treatment, & thus obtain his early release after ‘only’ seven weeks.   However, the sadistic judge who imposed the original savage sentence had not done with him yet:   He recruited West Yorkshire Police, who entered into a conspiracy with those who run the block of  ‘Sheltered'(???) Housing where the old veteran lives.  He tells the story below, with the title, ‘The Foulest Honey Trap Ever!’
IF you at the UKNDA have any respect for those who fought for their country all those years ago, you will be out in force at Leeds Magistrates’ Court at 1.30pm on Thursday 17th November 2011 to see the latest chapter in the CONTINUING persecution of this man, whose ‘crime’ has been to offer leaflets & use a loud hailer!  (& you thought we had free speech?!?!?!)
IF, on the other hand, you decide to stay away, & utter not a word of protest, you are giving carte blanche to an oppressive State, which WILL get worse – as they always do!  Remember Germany in the 1930s?  No, you don’t, but those who ignore history are fated to re-live it.    (Cc to British Forces News)

---

When sending ‘Foulest Honey Trap Ever!’, I quoted the words of ONE  of the charges against me, thinking the two were much the same.  Yes, they are – apart from one VERY important difference!   The second charge (the most important one) I quote below: 
“… with intent to cause JONATHAN ROSE harassment, alarm, or distress used threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress and the offence was religiously aggravated within the terms of section 28 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998”  
His ‘Honour'(?) Judge Jonathan Rose is of course the complainant, the Honey Trap was at his instigation – AND HE WILL BE THE MAIN PROSECUTION WITNESS!   I am looking forward to his evidence from the witness box – but looking forward even more to cross-questioning him after he has given it!
Norman Scarth. 
PS:  I have had to raid £1,000 from the money set by to pay for my funeral in order to buy computers for Tracey & myself, to replace the ones stolen by the police.  Tracey hasn’t even been charged with an offence (not even a trumped up one, as with me), yet they are refusing to return her computer.  £1,000 is a lot of money to me, but the information on the stolen ones is MUCH more valuable.  In my case it is beyond price!       
(The original ‘Honey Trap’ message is below, in case anyone hasn’t seen it before.)
Foulest ‘Honey Trap’ ever!  ‘SHELTERED Housing?!?!?!

Wed. 26^th October 2011:  c10am, a knock on the door of my Sheltered(?) Housing flat.  I opened it on the chain; pleasant looking young woman said, “My grandmother is moving into the flat next door, but she’s having (unspecified)trouble with the fridge.  Can you help her?”.  “Certainly” said I, “just wait till I’ve put some clothes on instead of my pyjamas”.  I put on shirt, trousers & flip-flop sandal, & walked down the passage.  As I reached the door, ‘Grandma’ showed herself to be not one wolf (as in Red Riding Hood), but FOUR of them who pounced on me & snapped handcuffs on while gabbling something about arresting me for some ridiculous ‘offence’ or other.  They refused to allow me back in my flat to close down my computer, turn off the oven, electrics etc, or get some warmer clothing.  These 5 officers had come 14 miles from Leeds to indulge in this trickery (as when thieving thugs use prostitutes to lure victims to where they can be robbed).  Unbeknown to me they had also sent several officers to arrest Tracey (my honorary niece) who had done nothing more than give me a lift in her car. 

I was then taken to Bradford’s equivalent of Moscow’s Lubyanka & kept there sitting on a hard bench, my ancient spine causing me pain, in solitary (apart from seeing the Duty Solicitor) until midnight, when I was charged with 2 ridiculous ‘offences’ & released on bail to make my own way home, dressed only in trousers, shirt & flip-flop sandals.   Still in shock & very cold, I had to wait 15 minutes for a taxi.  

Worse than the police trickery was that ‘Incommunities Ltd’, the owners of this block of ‘Sheltered’ (?) Housing, had conspired with the police as to how to lure me from my flat, & provided these thugs with access to the next door flat to hide in, then to pounce on me. 

Arriving back home I found they had stolen my computer, mobile phone & other things.  I learned that Tracey had been released after 10 hours, without charge, but her laptop had also been stolen.   

I am to appear at Leeds Magistrates’ Court, room 5 at 1.45pm on Thursday 17^th November to answer two charges of “Using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour or disorderly behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused alarm, harassment or distress, thereby, and that the offence was religiously aggravated within the terms of section 28 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998”.    

Only the most TWISTED of minds could use the words ‘religiously aggravated’ because I was telling people of the criminality of ‘Judge’ Jonathan Rose (who happens to be a Jew), when I was one of those who had fought to keep from our shores those who would have sent British Jews to the gas chambers – as they did with French Jews after they had defeated that country! 

It is clear now that when pouncing on me they had no idea what to charge me with: after I had been in the Lubyanka for 9 hours, they said they were going to get on to the Crown Prosecution Service to decide what charges to prefer, & “this will take about 2 hours”!  

My computer having been stolen, a friend has connected me back the Internet with an old, slow, laptop.  My list of email addresses was on the stolen computer, so I do not have all of them now, & ask that you spread this world-wide please.   I am anxious to get this off, but this computer being so slow, I may not send many more for the time being.  

I would have been less shocked if they had used a battering ram to get into my flat rather than the conspiracy with the Warden & owners of this ‘Sheltered’ Housing property.  I am slowly coming back to normal &, with suggestions from other people, think I may be able to beat these malicious charges. 

Many thanks to all my supporters.  As with putting me in prison last time, though bad for me, it may turn out to be the worst thing they could have done from their own point of view, in that the rest of the world will become more aware of the iniquities of Police State Britain.

Regards,

Norman Scarth.

Prisoner A19O3CF Norman Scarth — Free and Fighting Back!

Norman Scarth was jailed on the 26th July 2011 for the ridiculous offence of turning on a small recording device in court. He turned on this device because he didn’t trust the proceedings that were taking place in a court he believes to be corrupt and immoral.

After a vigorous campaign by his friends and supporters, Norman was released on the 9th of September 2011.

On the 27th of September 2011 Norman’s friends and supporters gathered at the Victoria Hotel in Leeds to listen to his story of political activism, his treatment in prison and his hopes and plans for the near future.

http://www.NormanScarth.blogspot.com

http://www.WeAreChangeLeeds.com

http://www.WeAreChangeManchester.com

Norman Scarth to Speak on 27.09.11

WeAreChangeLeeds.com are hosting an event on Tuesday 27 September 2011 (next week) at

The Victoria Hotel

Great George Street, Leeds

Function Room on the left hand side as you enter the Hotel.

Starts promptly at 7:30pm

Norman Scarth will give a presentation about recent events surrounding our Justice system, all are welcome, there is no entry fee or tickets.

Please share this post whether you are able to attend or not, thank you.

Solidarity from Salford

source:http://www.youtube.com/user/v964269

FREE NORMAN SCARTH was a campaign setup via social networking to…………FREE NORMAN SCARTH!
People were encouraged to use a picture of Norman Scarth as their profile picture on Facebook, and there were several groups and events setup whilst he was in prison.
I attended the protest outside H.M.P Leeds on 13th August 2011, with some friends and made a video from that day also which is on this same channel 😉
For his hearing at the Royal Courts in London on 25th August I was unable to show solidarity in London and again via social networking (I setup an event called FREE NORMAN SCARTH WEEK 19th – 26th August. Which was pulled by Facebook ironically) we suggested that those who couldn’t make the journey to London? Should stage a protest at their local magistrates courts and upload any pics and vids to Facebook, which we did after our protest outside Salford magistrates Courts. I also have another video on this channel from that day too 😉
We didn’t get the verdict we wanted on 25th August so an appeal hearing was arranged for 9th September 2011. Again I was unable to show solidarity in London, and the optomist in me said he would be released this time! So I thought, where better to be than in Leeds to welcome Norman Scarth back into freedom!
And that’s exactly what we did! 🙂 😀
Norman Scarth is an 85 year old WWII Veteran who was serving a 6 month sentence in H.M.P Leeds for making an audio recording in court.
Norman served on H.M.S Matchless on the arctic convoys (regarded as some of the most dangerous missions of WWII) and for that reason his story was picked up by Russia Today (nice work RT as usual) The same cannot be said for our mainstream media, who failed to pickup this story in either the press or Television, apart from Look North who showed a 2 minute clip on the day.
Norman Scarth is a living legend and in his own words:-
” I fought the Nazis 67 years ago. And I’m still fighting the Nazis today!!”
Norman Scarth has various videos on YouTube and also has his own blog which I am sure will be getting updated very soon and should be well worth a read and should also have a fair few more subscribers after what has gone on!
Normans story is an amazing one, but it is I am afraid only the tip of the iceberg! But this iceberg is going to sink the “justice system” around the World!
All that remains for me to say is….it was a pleasure to be involved in the FREE NORMAN SCARTH Campaign. It was an honour to be among the small group of people outside Armley Jail when Norman was released.
But the icing on the cake was being one of only 5 people who celebrated Normans release with him with a slapup meal, of which I am pleased, proud and priveledged to have been there.
Norman Scarth,,,,,,,,,,,,,we love you!

Norman Scarth is Now Free

Norman Scarth is now a free man.  This was our last call to action in this matter as posted on youtube.

Many thanks to all, there will be further posts and updates on this site in relation to media coverage and I am sure a lot of you will be wanting to know how Norman Scarth is in himself, so we will invite him to make some comment regarding this.

Thankyou to all from Team Norman!

Letter from Private Secretary (to the Queen) to Norman Scarth

Letter dated 31 August 2011 from Buckingham Palace to Norman Scarth