PLEASE, IF ANY OF YOU ARE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE ON THE MORNING OF 23rd JANUARY 2013, I URGE YOU TO DO SO. I DO BELIEVE IT WARRANTS A LARGE ATTENDENCE.
Though I am not important, I submit that which is below IS!
As some of you will know, Attorney-General Dominic Grieve & his gang of Quislings are determined that I, an 87 year old veteran of the Arctic Convoys of World War II, will be incarcerated in prison for what few years are left to me (though they REALLY want me in a Stalinist ‘Mental Hospital’!) That those who claim to be human beings can be so sadistic is hard to comprehend.
SUPPOSEDLY for ‘Contempt of Court’, it is REALLY to stop me exposing corruption.
It is MOST surprising that the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, has decided that HE HIMSELF will hear the AG’s Application.
It may be a foolish hope, but I have an idea that Lord Judge (who has made comment on the subject in the last couple of years) is taking the case as an opportunity to make an important Ruling on the Recording/Broadcasting of court hearings.
Among the allegations against me is that I offered leaflets inviting Judge Jonathan Lee Rose to resign, which I DID do, but which is NOT a crime, & that I committed the ‘most wicked contempt’ of posting a video of a court hearing on Youtube (which I did NOT do.)
Many reasons for banning the recording of hearings are put forward, most of them specious. The proponents of the ban claim, “No need for anyone to make a recording: The Official Transcript is available for anyone who wants it.” That might be a valid reason, IF the Official Transcripts could be trusted. Unfortunately they cannot!
As evidence, I will be offering to the Lord Chief Justice, one A4 page, containing just 86 words (sent it as an attachment now). It is the front page of an important document, the Judgment of the Appeal Court after what was SUPPOSED to be my Appeal against Conviction & Sentence in Sheffield Crown Court in 2001 (which was itself a Kangaroo Court!)
That front page, ‘Neutral Citation Number  EWCA Crim 2905’ ‘Approved by the Court, Crown copyright’ shows the bench as ‘LORD JUSTICE ROSE, MR BARLOW (Vice President of the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division), MR JUSTICE GIBBS, MR JUSTICE DAVIS’.
Lower down it says ‘MR M BARLOW appeared on behalf of the APPELLANT’.
How on earth could Mr Mark Barlow appear on behalf of me, when he was also sitting on the bench as Vice President of the Court of Appeal?
A silly mistake? Of course it was, but should there BE ‘silly mistakes’ in a document, ‘Approved by the Court, Crown Copyright’, which will be in the Official Court Records for hundreds of years?
The Judgment itself was just as ridiculous, but nastier. That is something for another day however. For today’s purpose, the front page will suffice.
Any reasons for banning recording of court hearings are blown out of the water when official transcripts of official recordings can be so blatantly false!
That which I offer now is only one example.
PS: Any who wish to know more, email me at firstname.lastname@example.org