January 2013 – Norman needs you!

PLEASE, IF ANY OF YOU ARE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE ON THE MORNING OF 23rd JANUARY 2013, I URGE YOU TO DO SO.  I DO BELIEVE IT WARRANTS A LARGE ATTENDENCE.
Though I am not important, I submit that which is below IS!
As some of you will know, Attorney-General Dominic Grieve & his gang of Quislings are determined that I, an 87 year old veteran of the Arctic Convoys of World War II, will be incarcerated in prison for what few years are left to me (though they REALLY want me in a Stalinist ‘Mental Hospital’!)    That those who claim to be human beings can be so sadistic is hard to comprehend.
SUPPOSEDLY for ‘Contempt of Court’, it is REALLY to stop me exposing corruption.
It is MOST surprising that the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, has decided that HE HIMSELF will hear the AG’s Application.
It may be a foolish hope, but I have an idea that Lord Judge (who has made comment on the subject in the last couple of years) is taking the case as an opportunity to make an important Ruling on the Recording/Broadcasting of court hearings.
Among the allegations against me is that I offered leaflets inviting Judge Jonathan Lee Rose to resign, which I DID do, but which is NOT a crime, & that I committed the ‘most wicked contempt’ of posting a video of a court hearing on Youtube (which I did NOT do.)
Many reasons for banning the recording of hearings are put forward, most of them specious.  The proponents of the ban claim, “No need for anyone to make a recording: The Official Transcript is available for anyone who wants it.”    That might be a valid reason, IF the Official Transcripts could be trusted.  Unfortunately they cannot!
As evidence, I will be offering to the Lord Chief Justice, one A4 page, containing just 86 words (sent it as an attachment now).  It is the front page of an important document, the Judgment of the Appeal Court after what was SUPPOSED to be my Appeal against Conviction & Sentence in Sheffield Crown Court in 2001 (which was itself a Kangaroo Court!)
That front page, ‘Neutral Citation Number [2002] EWCA Crim 2905’ ‘Approved by the Court, Crown copyright’ shows the bench as ‘LORD JUSTICE ROSE, MR BARLOW (Vice President of the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division), MR JUSTICE GIBBS, MR JUSTICE DAVIS’.

Lower down it says ‘MR M BARLOW appeared on behalf of the APPELLANT’.

How on earth could Mr Mark Barlow appear on behalf of me, when he was also sitting on the bench as Vice President of the Court of Appeal?

A silly mistake?  Of course it was, but should there BE ‘silly mistakes’ in a document, ‘Approved by the Court, Crown Copyright’, which will be in the Official Court Records for hundreds of years?

The Judgment itself was just as ridiculous, but nastier.  That is something for another day however.  For today’s purpose, the front page will suffice.

Any reasons for banning recording of court hearings are blown out of the water when official transcripts of official recordings can be so blatantly false! 

That which I offer now is only one example.

Norman Scarth.

PS:   Any who wish to know more, email me at againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk

The McKenzie friend – rights of audience case Law

CASE LAW

HM Prison Armley & Anor [2011] EWHC 2269 (Admin) (26 August 2011)

URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2011/2269.html

Cite as: [2011] EWHC 2269 (Admin)

1. … I was also asked to consider (by his McKenzie friend, Mr Jarvis) whether or not it was open to me to hear an application by the Claimant to purge his contempt.

3. … I was also addressed by his McKenzie friend, Mr Jarvis.

4. At the hearing on 25 August 2011 I was addressed at length by the Claimant. Mr Jarvis also made representations on his behalf.

7. The Claimant was not represented by a lawyer …

8. … Mr Jarvis made short submissions in support of those contentions. …

21. During the course of his oral representations Mr Jarvis raised the possibility of the Claimant applying to me to purge his contempt.

22. I should say for completeness that I assumed I had jurisdiction to grant bail not as the judge who had determined the application for habeas corpus against the Claimant but, rather, as a judge of the High Court who is authorised to sit in the Court of Appeal Criminal Division and to whom an application (albeit very informally) had been made for bail pending appeal.

[2011] EWHC 2269 (Admin)

BACKGROUND

People recently have been informing me of difficulties they have had while helping friends who may be facing Court action, with being recognised by the Court, as normally Court Magistrates and Judges are used to dealing with people who they term as Lawyers,

Wikipedia legal definition;

In England and Wales, “lawyer” is used loosely to refer to a broad variety of law-trained persons. It includes practitioners such as barristers, solicitors, legal executives and licensed conveyancers, ; and people who are involved with the law but do not practise it on behalf of individual clients, such as judges, court clerks, and drafters of legislation.

When playing my small part in the campaign to free Norman Scarth, one of my roles was that I acted as McKenzie friend in Court, which in real terms meant I actually took on the role of a Barrister and Solicitor combined, in that I filled out all the forms and created multiple copies of relevant paperwork, including evidence and dealt with communication to and from the Court and was even granted Legal visits to Norman Scarth in the Prison, going as far as applying for permission to take a tape recorder in, which permission was granted for.

I am not a legal professional, nor do I have any formal qualifications. I am self taught, driven by a desire to correct the inequality within the justice system.

Before this application was made, any application for a Writ has been made by very senior practising Lawyers who specialise within the High Court.

On the 25 August 2011, all that changed as it was written in to case Law that the rights of the common Law advocate remain, and are reasserted under the ever evolving status of ‘McKenzie friend’.

No application was made for rights of audience to address the judge, but it was simply granted.

The matter sat in both Civil and Criminal jurisdiction within the High Court of Justice (see paragraph 22) meaning this case Law has implications for every Civil and Criminal hearing at regional and national level.

WHAT THIS MEANS TO YOU

Legal Maxim “He who fails to assert his rights has none.”

This asserts in Law that any man or woman may have any representation of their own choosing and that representation does not have to be a recognised Lawyer or indeed have any qualifications.

Therefore if you wish to assist a friend in Court you may quote the above case Law, copy, paste and print, with its reference, and submit this to the Court in writing at the outset of proceedings.

The case law grants the McKenzie friend rights of audience in all matters whether Civil or Criminal proceedings.

The case law also established the right to make informal on the spot applications by the McKenzie friend.

It is your duty to assert your rights in this way, as it makes it easier for the next man or woman.

This way the judiciary gets used to doing things fairly again.

Please share this article and copy and paste as these are the rights of everyone.

Author : Chris Jarvis

5 yrs imprisonment awaits me – FOR POSTING THIS EMAIL!!!

Yesterday, 5th June 2012 I received by post three documents relating to my ‘trial’ at ManCityMags on 29th May 2012.  One is a letter from Gerry Wareham of the Crown Persecution Service relating to the computer stolen from me by West Yorkshire Stazi Police.  I will tell of that in another email.  Another is a ‘Notice of fine & collection order’ telling me that I was fined £50 on one charge, £100 on another & costs of £500 against me, with the usual threats if I fail to pay by 26th June 2012.  More of that will be told in another email.
THE MOST IMPORTANT IS THE THIRD ONE.  It is from Manchester & Salford Magistrates’ Court, Code 1723, Crown Square, Manchester M60 1PR.  Tel: 0161 830 4200, re Case number 061200160089 & dated 29 May 2012.  It PURPORTS to be a Court Order, though it carries neither name nor signature of a judge, no Court Seal, & is signed by some office boy or girl on behalf of Justices Clerk David Greensmith.  It is headed Restraining order   Order & continues:
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –  –
“This order is made to protect Jonathan Rose from further conduct which amounts to harassment.  Details of the Order: 1) Must not contact in any way Jonathan Rose or any member of his family.,  2)  Must not enter any Jewish Synagogue or Jewish Community Centre or loiter outside any such premises.,  3)  Must not enter any area in Leeds that is outlined in black on the attached map. This shall not apply when travelling through that area on public transport, without getting off that transport.,  4)  Not have in your possession in any public place any poster or leaflet which refers directly or indirectly to Jonathan Rose.,  5)  Must not distribute or instruct another to distribute any poster or leaflet that refers directly or indirectly to Jonathan Rose.,  6)  Must not write, post or upload to or upon any website or internet forum any comment that refers directly or indirectly (sic) Jonathan Rose.,  Prohibitions 1,2,4,5,6 to apply throughout England & Wales.
This order lasts until further order.
Warning  If you do not obey (sic) any part of this order you will commit an offence and may be sent to prison for up to five years.  You will commit the offence if you disobey this order even once.”
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –    
NOTE 1:  One of my ‘offences’ is supposed to be ‘Racially Aggravated’.  Anyone who can read that into ANY of my words (written or spoken) is an illiterate idiot.
NOTE 2: These Restraining Orders are part of the very nasty legislation brought in by the mass murderers & war criminals of the Blair Regime; Brought in for what APPEARED to be good purpose, they were designed to be used as a weapon by the Police State.  The same goes for the ‘Victim Impact Statements’ (see below)  The message they send out is that if you kill anyone (either accidentally, in your car, or deliberately) it is much better if that person is an orphan without friends or relations.  That way there will no parade of people to say how they too have suffered, & you will get a lighter sentence.
NOTE 3:  The CPS used this legal trickery to introduce Jonathan Lee Rose’s Statement as a  ‘Victim Impact Statement’ (when it could not be challenged) rather than as a Witness Statement, when it could AND WOULD have been challenged!
Much of Rose’s ‘Victim Impact Statement’ was a whining, whimpering, snivelling document, but in paragraph 12 he says:
“Every Jew, in every country has within him or her the most profound gratitude to those who fought the Nazis in the War, and fully appreciates the millions of lives lost in doing so.  We owe a deep debt of gratitude to those men and women and, living in the United Kingdom we acknowledge how the courage and bravery of servicemen from this country kept the Germans from invading, where failure would have meant that the Jews of the United Kingdom would likely have met the same fate of the millions who perished in the Nazi concentration camps.”
YET ROSE SHOWS HIS ‘GRATITUDE’ BY SENTENCING ONE OF THOSE MEN TO 6 MONTHS IN A HELL-HOLE PRISON!    Now, because I have sent this email, AND will publish it on my blog, he wants me to be sent there FOR FIVE YEARS!!!   Well, they’ll have to catch me first.
Norman Scarth.
PS:  Talk about stupid!!  Rose claimed that I must have gone to an awful lot of trouble to find out that he was President of the United Hebrew Congregation.   Not at all:  The reference book ‘Who’s Who’ (containing potted biographies of those considerd to be important people) is available in all public libraries.  ALL judges of Circuit level & above are in it, with names of parents, date of birth, education, career, positions held, marriages, divorces, offspring, books published, hobbies etc. etc.  I did not know where he lived, though the fact that while on bail I was banned from entering the large Leeds 17 area indicated that he lived within it.  Now, having sent me a map of the much smaller area from which I am now banned, it is fair gues that he lives near the centre of that triangular area of about one & a half miles each side, i.e. within a half mile or so radius of Moortown water tower & Roundhay Park.  Not a large area if I were minded to search for the very nasty but quite pathetic creature – which I’m not!  

PPS:  This is being sent to some of the large number of people on the The State Payroll who have been (EXPENSIVELY!) used in this persecution, in the hope that just one of them might have a prick of conscience at what they are prepared to do to draw their salaries & protect their pensions.    Personally, I would rather starve in the gutter than do what they do.  NS.

To Manchester City Magistrates’ Court – AND to the Nation!

Even if I could overcome my fear of those who so abuse their power in today’s Britain sufficiently to set foot in England, after the trauma of fleeing their persecution, I do not have strength enough left to travel back all the way over the sea to Manchester.  In the event that this malicious prosecution is allowed to go ahead, I ask that  Mr. Keith Dewsnup should speak on my behalf.  It SHOULD be enough to say if Taffe or some other District Judge goes ahead with this KNOWING THE POLICE & CPS ARE DENYING ME my stolen computer (& the material on it needed for my defence), then such DJ is himself party to the crime of ‘PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, which is subject to life imprisonment.   If there is even the PRETENCE of law in Manchester, they MUST declare ‘NO CASE TO ANSWER’, the warrant for my arrest be withdrawn, costs which reflect the malice of the prosecution & the trauma inflicted on me should be awarded to me.   All communications with me should be by email.   If something MUST be sent by post, it should be sent to:
Mr. Norman Scarth, C/o. 14 Willow Park Crescent, ATHLONE, Co. Westmeath, Republic of Ireland. 

ManCityMags 29/5/12 9.45am. Taffe; Masters Eyre & Cook@RCJ; Treasury Solicitor.

To DJ Taffe at Manchester City Magistrates’ Court, Stephen Jones of the Treasury Solicitor’s Office, Master Eyre & Master Cook at the RCJ.

The only response to the messages below is a message from Stepen Bradley saying that my request to postpone the case till 2pm “has been put before DJ Taffe, who has stated that the case must go ahead at 9.45am as originally listed.  He is satisfied that you, Mr Scarth are aware of the case, & should be here as directed.”  Taffe (masquerading as a magistrate) completely ignores the vitally important points I raise in the messages below about the Right to a Fair Hearing (as required by Article 6 of the ECtHR & the 1998 HRA – to say nothing of Natural Justice!).  That he should  condone the extra-judicial criminality of Jonathan Lee Rose (colluding with Stazi-like police & collaborators Incommunities Ltd.) in the theft of my computer etc. (containing evidence vital for my defence) makes him party to the crime of Perverting the Course of Jusice.
IT IS AN ILLUMINATING COINCIDENCE that on 25/5/12, the same day as the message from Taffe, I received one from Stephen Jones of the Treasury Solicitor’s Office, in which he says, “Dear Mr Scarth, Further to my letter to you of 23 April 2012, I would be grateful if you could give me a call to discuss the hearing on 29/06/2012 at 12pm and the case in general.  I have tried to contact you by telephone but I am unable to leave a message.  Kind regards,  Stephen 

Stephen Jones, Litigation A1

T 020 7210 2915| F 020 7210 3250

Treasury Solicitor’s Department

One Kemble Street | London | WC2B 4TS

DX 123242 KINGSWAY.       

The Treasury Solicitor is acting for the Defendants in opposing my High Court Claim against The British State for £10,000,000, not by any means an extravagant claim, considering it relates to SIXTEEN YEARS OF PERSECUTION from the age of 70 (this malicious prosecution in Manchester being a continuation of it at the age of 86!)    Why should Jones want to speak to me on the telephone?  He knows I am in Ireland.  Why is he afraid to put what he has to say in print?   He ends with “Kind Regards”:  What hypocrisy!  This is the man who, in his Application to have my Claim struck out, uses sneers & insults, with the hackneyed accusation (as used by ALL lawyers against ALL Litigants In Person) that it is ‘An Abuse of the Process of the Law’.  With our ‘adversarial system’ it is perhaps understandable (though NOT excusable) that he should use this legal trickery.   However, that Master Eyre & Master Cook at the Royal Courts of Justice should leave their SUPPOSEDLY impartial position, enter the arena & join Jones in that accusation is outrageous.  They, like all their kind, are determined to do their best to stop this horror story ever being heard by a jury.   They quote the Civil Procedure Rules.  Those Rules followed Lord Woolf’s Access to Justice Report.   Like so much else brought in by the mass murderers & war criminals of Lawyer Blair’s Regime, they are used to do the exact opposite, ESPECIALLY  when MIS-used by such as Eyre & Cook.

It is notable that in his 1995 Interim Report Lord Woolf himself said “The LIP who has taken the trouble to study the law (& present his case well) will find the rules are flouted by the opposing lawyer AND THAT THIS IS CONDONED BY THE JUDGE”! (my emphasis)   That of course is in gross breach of the Judicial Oath which they swore as a condition of their appointment – & the salary that goes with it!  At the very least that is surely obtaining money by false pretences?     
It is even more notable that Lord Woolf left that out of his Final Report, published about three years later.  No doubt he had been jumped on by his colleagues for letting the cat out of the bag?

The situation described above shows all too clearly how ‘Justice’ works only one way in Britain:  What purport to be the ‘Forces of Law & Order’ will use any & every means, legal or illegal to silence anyone who dares to speak the truth and/or expose corruption.  Yet the Litigant In Person who has been wronged & seeks a remedy in the courts (civil or criminal) will find he is obstructed at every step by the professionals.  Taffe was the fourth of five District Judges who used their ‘discretion’ unlawfully in refusing to issue summonses against those who had committed serious crime against me.   Yet when it comes to this malicious prosecution, rather than continue with the case in my absence on 23rd February 2012, as I had requested, he gloried in issuing a warrant for my arrest – WITHOUT BAIL!

Master Cook has said that if I am unable to make the journey from Ireland to the RCJ on 29th June 2012 I must appoint a lawyer.  Some of you will be aware that I garnered several email addresses of people in the Law Society & the Bar Council, sent a message reminding them of the debt they owe to those like me, & asking if they knew any lawyer with conscience & courage enough to defend me against the malicious prosecution & represent me in my civil actions.  So far there has been no response.   No surprise there!  As Honoray Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society I have much more experience than just my own, & speak with authority in saying that the hatred of lawyers for the LIP equals that of the Nazis for the Jews.  So great is this hatred that a lawyer who acts for a person who has ever been a LIP will do so only to stitch him up.   Sad, but all too true.

Norman Scarth.

The Magna Carta, Norman Scarth and the Ministry of Justice fail

A Man exiled from the land of his birth, a land that has become HMP UNITED KINGDOM LTD

The worlds largest concentration camp.

Norman Scarth of the Article 6 group, features in this video as a man that has been exiled under the duress of facing highly questionable judicial proceedings against him, with reason to silence him for highlighting the lack of free speech and inequality in the Law with regard to rights generally.

When will you expose the Legal / Judicial Mafia?

by Norman Scarth via email

To ALL the so-called ‘News Media’ – Press, TV & Radio:  As the text with this video says, you expose cowboy builders, car repairers & the like, but NEVER expose the biggest crooks of all, the Legal/Judicial Mafia, who operate  the most successful Protection Racket in the world!
My father fought for his King & Country in the Great War & worked honestly & hard all his life.  I fought for my King & Country in World War II & have also worked honestly & hard all my life.  Yet the persecution inflicted on me for the last 17 years by this Mafia is increasing to such an extent that at the age of 86 I have been forced to flee the land of my birth & seek asylum in the Republic of Ireland.
Norman Scarth (veteran of the Arctic Russian Convoys & the Scharnhorst battle of WW2. Only 200 of us left now). 

BBC PROMOTE LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS AS IF THEY ARE A FORCE FOR GOOD(VIDEO)

Shyster Roy Anderson in Leeds Magistrates’ Court

Norman has asked that we all assist in spreading this video of his time in Leeds Magistrates, prior to his adventure in seeking asylum in Hitler’s homeland of Austria. Please feel free to do just that.

Those lovely people at the RCJ have issued my Claims!!!

by email from Norman Scarth

Problem: how am I going to spend all this money?  

Shortly before I was forced to flee the land of my birth I lodged with the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court of Justice two Claims:  One was against three Secretaries of State for £10,000,000 for 17 years of persecution.  The other was against Incommunities Ltd. (the landlords of the block of ‘Sheltered’[??] Housing where I lived) for £200,000 for Breach of Contract.   Blatant obstruction from the Fees Office was tiresome & time wasting, but after I pointed out the criminality of their conduct, it appears they backed down & allowed the Claims to go through.  They have been given case numbers (HQ12X00738 for the £10m & HQ12X763 for the £200k) & ‘issued’.  It appears to be ‘Master Eyre’ who has authorised the Issuing, but he has appended a VERY strange Note to each of them: “(1) There is leave to issue this claim-form.  (2) The Claimant must serve the claim-form, and  must do so within 4 months of the date on which the claim-form is shown by the seal as issued.   (3)  However, the claim-form must not be served without the permission of the Assigned Master.  (4)  The Claimant must obtain that permission by attending the Assigned Master in any Practice taken by him (the office here can give details).”

I find this very strange indeed & suspect that (3) & (4) are illegal.  Could it be a ruse to get me to leave my safe haven so that I can be arrested?  I am minded to ignore 3 & 4 & serve the claim-forms on the Defendants anyway.  I would be grateful for the thoughts of any of you about that. 

Norman Scarth.

PS:  Will inform you of my whereabouts in the next message.  (Though better, Internet is still very slow here).

PPS:  How to spend all the money?  THAT is the least of my problems:  You can be sure there will be more skulduggery to come!   

Police Seeking the Fugitive Norman Scarth

It is our understanding after attending his hearing recently where an arrest warrant was issued without bail, the ‘authorities’ are aware that Norman Scarth is out of the country.

The Police have decided to start doing house searches within the land mass known as England.

The first report of this is yesterday (12 03 12) at 08:15am when they knocked on the door of Tracey Zareie where it is reported by her via her facebook page entry later that day, that the Police carried out a search of her home in their relentless pursuit to capture the criminal mastermind Norman Scarth.

There is no evidence to support Norman Scarth being there, we can only assume that this is some sort of intimidation technique against those that have been keen observers, and there was an apparant warrant to search the premesis, although this may still be deemed as a breach of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 which guarantees a person privacy in their home.

To be conducting house to house inquiries for an 86 year old man who was handing out leaflets, to find him and to lock him up, can only be looked on as some sort of bizarre persecution by the state considering that the ‘complainant’ is a Judge and a member of their club.

This also means that any ‘trial’ of Norman Scarth for handing out the leaflets is met with ‘bias’, this is a breach of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 which provides in Law a guarantee of an ‘independent’ tribunal.

If it is found that any more homes are searched without warrants then complaints and Private Prosecutions may be taken out against any Police officer breaching a persons rights, being that we are all equal in Law.